A handful of weekends ago, while running with a friend, I asked her about her latest marathon. She had plenty to say about the poor organization, but what bugged her the most, and with plenty of reason, was her pacerâs strategy.
Banking time is the worst racing strategy ever (Image by Grok)
My friend and her buddy were aiming for a specific time goal and decided a pacer was the way to reach it. Isnât that why theyâre there? But this particular one decided the way to achieve the goal was to go faster so the group could âbank time and be ahead when they were tired at the endâ.
What? Seriously? What running genius came up with that one? WTF?
The reason for a pacerâs existence is to keep a pace, hence the name. Theyâre there to facilitate the feasibility of you achieving a preset finishing time. I wrote about running with a pacer a few years ago, so Iâm not going into the details of what it entails. I do recommend you check out that post by clicking here.
Letâs illustrate how bad this strategy sucks with an example: Letâs say you trained for a 3:59 marathon, so you’re averaging about 9:05 per mile. If your pacer is running just 5% faster, which doesnât seem like much, he/she will be guiding you at 8:38 per mile. If you can make it to 15 miles in 2:09:30 without imploding, you will be 6:45 ahead. To make your goal time, you now have 1:49:30 to complete 11 miles. That is a 9:57 pace.
Does this make sense for someone who trained to run around a 9:05 pace?
Ensuring you hit the wall with enough time to spare when the suck fest begins will not improve your chances of hitting your goal. Thatâs a guarantee. My friend and her friend did the right thing; they ditched the pacer and ran their own race.
This said, what is the most sensible racing strategy for a race?
Negative Split
The best strategy is usually the negative split. Even though it sounds bad just because of the word ânegativeâ, it is the sensible way to go, especially as distances or time on your feet get longer.
A negative split means you complete the second half of your race faster than the first. This can be achieved by properly managing a race. You start easy as you warm up and sort out the initial foot traffic, you follow your race plan to the tee, you hydrate and fuel properly, and then, you have plenty in the tank to coast to the finish line. Strong, happy, and having achieved your goal. Speaking for me alone, this is a better experience than having a few minutes to spare during a guaranteed, miserable end of the race.
In the example above, imagine the runner took three miles to warm up at 20 seconds over marathon pace, then picked it up at 5 seconds over pace until halfway. Then she picked it up for 10 miles at marathon pace, and when she found herself at mile 23, she still had enough to kick it up a notch, going 7 seconds under pace. That is a marathon in 3:59:28. First half in 2:00:50 and the second half in 1:58:38, a 2:12 negative split.
What makes more sense?
But What About a 5K?
One thing is a 5k, another one is a longer distance where you canât push with all your might for the duration of the race.
There is a valid 5K racing strategy where you run the first mile as fast as you can, the second one a tad slower as you adjust for fatigue, and then you hold for dear life on the last mile to give it whatever you have left. This is different from banking time, as it is a short race in which you are taking advantage of being fresh at the start. You donât have time to adjust if you make a mistake, and you still have enough in you to finish strong, even without a negative split.
There are plenty of bad racing strategies, such as running someone elseâs race, running ahead of the pacers, trying new gear, not warming up if you plan to start fast, etc. But among all these crappy ones, there is an undisputed world-record holder: Banking time for later.
Any thoughts? Please share in the comment box below.
A couple of weeks ago, I was running a local 10K, and approaching Mile 3, I noticed a runner ahead of me, maybe in his early 40s. He caught my eye because of his weird running form. As I got closer, I saw that his left shoelace was undone. So, as I reached him, I did what a normal runner would do: âHey, your shoelaces are undoneâ.
This shouldn’t happen. Ever! (Image by ChatGPT)
As I passed him, he replied with some level of exasperation: âYeah, I know! Thatâs why I am opening my leg to the left, so I donât trip.â I shrugged my shoulders and kept running my race. My job was done. The guy thanked me, and that was that. I guess he must not have kissed the ground, since I didnât see or hear any emergency vehicles on the road.
There are so many wrong things with the scene. I completed the race in a tad over one hour, so it is not like this runner was going for any earth-shattering world records. And even if he was going for a PR, this was not helping. How could someone decide the risk of tripping and falling on the asphalt with 2000 runners behind was not worth 30 seconds of your finishing time? How much saved time is worth getting injured, as you decided to change your mechanics to adjust your unlaced shoe?
I was wondering what kind of runner does not perform the most basic checks on their equipment before a race. And thus, here you are reading a blog post on the subject.
The scope of this post is not to teach you how to tie your shoes properly. There are too many ways to get into the top 10 here. And by now you should know how to tie your shoes.
Unless you have the finish line in plain sight, the right way to approach this situation is to step to the side, stop, redo shoelaces properly, both shoes, and then resume activity.
At the bare minimum, you should verify you have tied a double knot. And if the remaining lace is too long and is jumping all over the place, which will eventually make it looser, take the extra string and place it between the shoeâs tongue and laces. That will keep it secure for the duration of your run.
For every single run, not just a race, it is your responsibility to perform a basic check on all your equipment. How about these situations:
âș Imagine a shortstop with broken leather straps in his gloveâs pocket when he is fielding a line drive and the winning run is on third base.
âș Imagine a referee at a soccer game checking the overtime in a championship match to find the watch has run out of battery.
âș Imagine a swimmer in the middle of a 400 combined with her swimming goggles hanging from her neck.
âș Imagine yourself in your goal race, pushing for a PR, and your shoelaces are undone.
30 extra seconds will pay off in the long run (Photo: Tirachard Kumtano, Pexels)
And as we talk about shoelaces, understand that this is a generic reference to all your running equipment. All of it.
âș The time to realize your shortsâ elastic band wonât hold is not when you are 5 miles away from your car.
âș The time to realize you donât have enough safety pins to attach your bib for tomorrowâs race is not right before you go to bed.
âș The time to figure out the sole of your shoe is separating is not when you still have 10 miles to go in your marathon.
âș The time to figure out that gel is expired is not when it is in your mouth just when you are counting on those extra calories.
âș The time to discover your headlamp has run out of battery is not in the middle of your night run.
We must own it. It is our responsibility to ensure that all our equipment is in good condition to perform the task at hand. And if it is not, assume that the only one to blame is yourself. Learn from it and make sure it never happens again.
Any stories you would like to share about basic equipment failures? Please do so in the comment box below.
When I started running over four decades ago, there was very little literature on the sport. A new book here or there, mostly from runners sharing their own experience; or a subscription to Runnerâs World or The Runner magazine, was it for sources of knowledge and inspiration?
Well into the second running boom, with the internet in play and billions of Dollars to be made, companies started investing in science, research, and development. Colleges and Universities began promoting their exercise physiology departments, and suddenly, we have more information than we can digest.
Many bad habits and myths remain from those prehistoric running days. There are still runners who believe that consuming the 7th serving of pasta the night before the marathon will give them an edge. We still have those who prefer collapsing rather than chop a mile from their long run on a mid-summer day.
Below you will find six basic strategies to unlock your training, especially now that racing season is almost here.
1 â It is about consistency: Hitting all those splits is awesome, but it is not whatâs going to make you better. You hit the splits because you are better. There is no magic workout that will take you over the top. Good and bad workouts are part of the mix, and if you have more good ones than bad ones, you are on the right track. Every time you perform, you get a little bit better. All those little bits eventually fill the bucket. Thatâs where your PR lies. Not on that PR 400-meter repeat in training. Focus on the long game as you train as often as your body allows. You will see the difference.
2 â Progress smartly: There are no shortcuts in running. Sure, you can run a marathon while untrained, but at what price? Is getting injured through a sufferfest worth a medal? What got you to the marathon will not get you to the 100-miler. What got you to the 5K PR wonât get you to the marathon PR. You must have a plan to get from Point A to Point B and then to Point C. If you plan to keep running for a long time, you must play the long game, and that requires smart progress.
3 â Accept the runner you are and train for it: You are not Eliud Kipchoge, and most likely you wonât be in the leading peloton at the Boston Marathon. Regardless of whether you are a local semi-elite or a back-of-the-pack runner, accept it so you can become the best runner you can be. If you are a 5-hour marathoner, it doesnât matter how much you train; you will not make it to the Olympics. But you can go sub-5. Focus on what will help you improve your journey, not through the pressure of Instagram make-believe lives. Eliminate external, unnecessary pressures and pursue the big goal that aligns with your reality.
Technology can be great and can be detrimental to your training. It is up to you to use it properly (Photo: Pexels).
4 â Variety is the key: Long-slow running is good. Zone 2 is good. Intervals are good. Cross-training is good. Goal pace runs are good. But you need to mix them up the right way to give your body enough recovery time to adapt to the work. In a recent article I read, Will Lennox wrote in GQ Australia: âTaking a leaf from the Bible and training for 40 days and 40 nights in a row in the hope some biblical-level miracle will happen to you is not going to get you into running heaven.â Rest. Give your body the chance to recover so it can do it again and guarantee your progress.
5 â It is not about gear and technology: While running on the wrong shoe can certainly be detrimental and even harmful to a runner, it is never the shoe that makes you faster. It is all in your preparation. A pair of super-shoes will give you an edge to shave those last few seconds from a 5K, but itâs not what will get you from a 3:30 to a Sub-3 marathoner. The same applies to the GPS watch. Donât let it rule your life. Turn off all the indicators of parameters you donât understand and/or distract you. Let them be tools, not the beacon that guides your running.
6 â Donât forget to have fun: Nothing kills the joy of running more than comparing yourself with friends and influencers. While the reasons for running vary for every athlete, running because you like it makes it easier to stick with it. Rebounding from a bad race or an injury will be easier. Accepting your limits instead of quitting will be a given.
In conclusion, we should simplify our running. This doesnât mean taking it easy, nor working hard, nor forgoing progress. It means unlocking the running potential you have today, smartly. This is what will keep you running for years to come.
Share your favorite running training strategy in the comments. Which one works best for you?
Back in June, I watched online as Faith Kipyegon unsuccessfully tried becoming the worldâs first sub-4 miler woman. The event was one of those multi-million-dollar circus shows put on by Nike to test human physical limitations. It was elaborate enough that, just like Eliud Kipchogeâs Sub-2 in 2019, it would not have counted as a world record should she succeed.
Athletics and the principle of diminishing returns (Image by ChatGPT)
Kipchoge needed to improve his marathon time by 100 seconds, and he did, finishing 19 seconds ahead of his previous record. Kipyegon needed to shave about 8 seconds (7.65) to achieve her goal, but she ended up about 6.5 seconds short. Even with the circus, space technology, support, and male pacing, she couldnât do it.
The failed attempt got me thinking about a basic concept in economics that easily applies to running: the principle of diminishing returns. In economics, this means that ff you improve one variable while keeping all the others constant, the incremental output gained from each extra unit will eventually fall. In other words, building a skyscraper in one day wonât be solved with more workers.
The same principle applies in athletics. Dr. George Sheehan, one of the greatest running writers, put it this way: âThe first mile is the most helpful one as far as conditioning goes. Each succeeding one gives less and less benefit than the one before. Runners who work more and more are working for less and less. [âŠ] It doesnât take much to get 90% fitness, only a few miles a day. But it takes progressively more and more training as you get closer to your ultimate potential. At the highest levels, you are putting in a huge investment for a very small return. It is the small gains what makes the difference between winning and losing.â
Think about it, itâs obvious. If not, it would be a matter of time and more miles before we all became elite athletes and broke world records. We all have a limit, and while reaching it is feasible, it requires a tremendous amount of work.
I recently heard Coach Steve Magness share a story where Shalane Flanagan told him something along the lines of, âThe difference between being in 2:30 marathon shape and 2:20 is astronomical.â For you and me, average, mid-to-back-of-the-pack marathoners, a 10-minute improvement may be a diligent training cycle away. For elites in a Marathon Major, this same result guarantees them peeing in a cup to verify cheating.
Nice background, Coach! But how does this apply to me, the average weekend warrior?
It is about training smarter, not harder (Image by ChatGPT)
I am glad you asked! The point of this introduction is for the reader to understand that the curve of progress in running flattens as we improve. It is a reality we canât solve with harder training. Progress is not a linear proposition.
And, while achieving the last 10% requires an astronomical effort, it is feasible. It is about figuring out what works for you. Just because Jacob Ingebrigtsen uses the Norwegian double threshold method doesnât mean it is the solution youâve been looking for. He is in such shape that this is the only type of training that will extract the extra hundredths of a second needed to break a world record. This training may land you, my dear average-runner reader, on the injury list.
Working around the principle of diminishing returns to reach your apex requires smarter training. Not just harder. As gains slow, finding that sweet spot between effort and recovery is the magic sauce. It may mean varying your workouts, adjusting intensity levels, or prioritizing recovery and nutrition more seriously. As we improve, we must tune into our bodyâs signals, such as fatigue, soreness, or lack of motivation. These can guide adjustments before you hit a training (or overtraining) wall. If in doubt, a training plan tailored exclusively for you may help you progress without burning out.
In conclusion, In athletics, more is not necessarily better. Most of what elite runners do to squeeze that last sliver of greatness out of their performance does not apply to you. We are all limitless, sure, but not in all areas of our human performance, athletics being one of them. Letâs work hard to reach our goals, but not at the expense of burning out.
What are your thoughts on this principle? I will read and answer your comments.
Back in April 2021, I published a guest blog post titled âRunning With Lymphomaâ, written by Annamarie McCormickHowell. The content is self-explanatory. Ten days ago, I received an email from Jen M, a runner with lymphoma who found the post and asked if I could put her in contact with the author. This made me wonder about Annamarieâs journey since then, so I invited her for an update.
Thank you again for the opportunity! Jen told me how long and hard she searched to find a person, a study, any data on people who run through lymphoma or R-CHOP, and the article you published is the only tangible thing she was able to find. I had no idea there wasn’t a larger body of humans doing precisely what I did, so I appreciate you connecting us!!
Life looks different than it did back on the day of my Chemotherapy Half Marathon, though some things remain the same, primarily, the daily morning run.
After cancer, nothing returns to normal, though I did notice a few weeks after R-CHOP, I had the sensation that I imagine to be akin to blood dopingâhaving the appropriate number of white and red blood cells again made me feel unstoppable, as the chemo drugs slowly exited my system. I was able to run more, sustain paces, and even dabble in a few local races! After a few months, the novelty wore off a bit when I plateaued. I felt disappointment, followed by immediate guilt: I was alive, and my cancer wasnât. How could I possibly be dissatisfied with something as trivial as running when I had managed to survive such an experience?
Winning the womenâs race and 2nd overall at the 18.12 Challenge earlier this summer!
It was then that the universe gave me the greatest gift: a coach who saw not who I was in that moment, but who I could be. The indomitable April approached my training with expertise, confidence, and solidarity. Her lack of doubt in my abilities and body made up for ALL the doubt I was feeling. She literally ran into my life and began to push me in the most loving, challenging, unforeseen ways.
We started focusing on macronutrients, as I had lost a good amount of muscle mass to the chemo, and started training for short distancesâ specifically the 5K, with repeats like I had never performed before in my life. A few months later I felt like a new person, not the person I was before cancer, but someone who had transformed all those brand new âbaby cellsâ after chemo into an athlete I didnât know I could become. I began lifting heavy and loading my muscles and tendons as much as I could handle. I ran every workout April wrote for me, even the ones I looked at and thought âThere is NO wayâŠâ
Since then, I have run a multitude of races and distances, including a marathon PR at Chicago in 2022, surprised and shocked by the amazing community support I received, spearheaded by my incredible coach. Today I am a stronger runner than I have ever been- before or after cancer. It hasnât been easy, linear, or without setbacks, but no oneâs running journey is predictable.
My previous blog post about cancer started with my 32nd birthday run, and this one will close with my 37th birthday run: this year I ran 37 happy, healthy, strong miles in this post-cancer body.
Coach Annamarie McCormick-Howell is an RRCA Certified Running Coach and an ACSM Certified Personal Trainer. She lives in Sackets Harbor, NY. You can follow her on Instagram at @amcchowell or reach her via email at amccormickhowell@yahoo.com.
